Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 KAN 386 - Head v. Spier

Head v. Spier’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
6
states following
March 1957
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1957

15 state decisions

60190319101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Martin · Holden v. Spier · Merrill v. Lake · Fletcher v. Wormington · Smith v. Lynch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The probate court, having jurisdiction to make settlement and distribution of a decedent’s estate, may determine the share of each distributee, and to that end can inquire into and determine the indebtedness of the distributee to the .estate and order a deduction of the same from his share.” (syl. ¶ 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.