Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 KAN 754 - In re Hamilton

In re Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
December 1979
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1979

15 state decisions

3019031910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mercein v. People ex rel. Barry · Weir v. Marley · Dubois v. Johnson · State ex rel. Lembke v. Bechdel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After a careful examination of the authorities, we are inclined to the opinion that, in cases of this character, where the controversy arises over the custody of a child, the real issue is one between private parties contesting a question of private right, under the form of habeas corpus proceedings, in which there arises no question of personal liberty, and in consequence all matters in issue arising upon the same state of facts determined in the prior proceeding should be regarded as settled and concluded.” (Page 756.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.