66 Md. App. 263 - Dillsworth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2016
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · Tichnell v. State · Newton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At the close of the defense’s case below, appellant’s counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal “an the grounds [that] there is insufficient evidence to establish the intent to commit such a crime.” As no argument was made below on this precise issue, it is not preserved for our review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If any person ... shall assault or beat any person, with intent to maim, disfigure or disable such person ... every such offender ... shall be guilty of a felony----””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dillsworth v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.