66 Md. App. 580 - Irby v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Jones v. State (1991), 139 Md. App. 188 - Thomas v. State (2001)
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Specht v. Patterson · Washington Homes, Inc. v. Interstate Land Development Co. · Walczak v. State · M/V American Queen v. San Diego Marine Contruction Corp. · 65 Ill. 2d 157 - People v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“settled, of course, that the courts, trial and appellate, take notice of their own respective records in the present litigation, both as to the matters occurring in the immediate trial, and in previous trials or hearings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A separate occasion shall be considered one in which the second or succeeding offense is committed after there has been a charging document filed for the preceding occasion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Irby v. Coplin“affords the defendant the right of confrontation and cross-examination required under the Due Process Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Irby v. Coplin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.