Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 MINN 421 - Shepard v. Blossom

Shepard v. Blossom’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1973
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1973

4 state decisions

20189619001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine & Machine Works · Wolford v. Baxter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * We are of the opinion that the finding that these machines are a part of the realty should be sustained. As said in Wolford v. Baxter, supra, `Ponderous articles, although only annexed to the land by the force of gravitation, if placed there with manifest intent that they shall permanently remain, may be fixtures.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.