Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 Misc. 535

In re Kirk

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1910

New York Supreme Court · decided 1910-03-15

<p>Election of officers — Nominations and preparation of official ballot — Primary — Enrollment — Marking enrollment blanks.</p> <p>The provision of section 26 of the Election Law for marking an enrollment blank with a pencil having black lead is directory merely, and although a voter used a fountain pen he may compel the board of elections to place his party affiliation upon the enrollment book of his election district.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1910-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1973

3 state decisions

101910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Aspinall, J.

¶1This motion is brought to compel the hoard of elections of the city of Kew York to convene and place the party affiliation of the said William A. Kirk upon the enrollment hook of the twentieth election district of the tenth Assembly district of the borough of Brooklyn. It appears from, the moving papers that the petitioner used a fountain pen instead of a pencil having black lead in marking a cross within the circle beneath the emblem of the party in which *536he desired to enroll, thereby failing to follow the directions of the statute in relation to this subject. In my opinion the intent of the statute is to secure a statement of party affiliation for public use, as the statute directs the board of elections to publish for general use after election day the declaration of every citizen as to his party affiliation. In this respect it clearly differs from the provision of the statute relating to marking ballots. There the form used is to maintain absolute secrecy as to the manner in which the citizen voted, and directs the use of a pencil having black lead to maintain a uniformity of procedure, so as to prevent the marking of a ballot in any manner which might lead to its subsequent identification. It is, therefore, evident, and it has been so held in this court in numerous proceedings of a similar character in the past, without a written opinion, however, that the law relating to the use of a pencil having black lead on enrollment blanks is merely directory and not mandatory; and where the board cf elections is enabled by the marking to determine the intention of the citizen with reference to his party affiliation it should so record the intent of the citizen.

¶2Motion granted.

/66/misc/535 · .json · Public domain