Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 Misc. 2d 505

Platt v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1971-04-20

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1999

2 district · 4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-04-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Plaintiff has failed to show that defendant Hertz gave its express or implied permission to defendant Messina to drive the truck. Defendant may validly restrict the operation of its vehicle by an unlicensed driver pursuant to the terms of its written rental agreement signed by the lessee. (Burmaster v. State of New York, 7 N Y 2d 65, 70.)

¶2The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

¶3Concur — Gold, J. P., Quran and Lupiano, JJ.

¶4Order reversed,, etc.

/66/misc2d/505 · .json · Public domain