66 N.C. App. 161 - Rose v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2012
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Munchak Corp. v. Caldwell · McLean v. Keith · Moore v. Moore · Burke v. Burke · Burke v. Burke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We note that the trial court found that Defendant was deliberately squandering his assets, in the face of his undisputed child support and alimony liabilities. The remedy of specific performance, therefore, does no more than”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A damage award in this case, defendant being insolvent, will not compensate plaintiff nor compel defendant to perform his part of the bargain. The parties' contract had clear and definite terms.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“compel [defendant] to do precisely what he ought to have done without being coerced by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.