Ball v. Beaumont’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1929
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Plainly, then, the only chance for plaintiff to recover is by the establishment of a partnership transaction, so that Penn’s knoAvledge and ratification of plaintiff’s acts Avould be a ratification by both defendants. The condition of affairs seems to be that plaintiff has no direct knowledge of the relative positions tOAvard this transaction of the tAVO defendants. Penn says it was a partnership transaction, and Beaumont that it was a personal one of Penn’s and an endeavor on the latter’s part to raise his share of the firm’s capital, in Avhich Beaumont signed th¿ note, as surety. If the note itself is avoided for alterations, and does not furnish a basis of recovery, the burden of proving a partnership transaction and a valid authorization or ratification by the partnership of the payment, is on plaintiff.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ball v. Beaumont
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.