66 N.J. Super. 465 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2008
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 46 N.J. Super. 193 - State v. Bentley · State v. Gallo · 21 N.J. Super. 457 - State v. Mulvaney · State v. Gallo · State v. Lotegano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has been held [ State v. Lotegano, 12 N.J. Misc. 49 [ 169 A. 529 ] ( S.Ct. 1933), error dismissed, 113 N.J.L. 176 [ 173 A. 136 ] (E. & A. 1934)] that where defendant was being tried for robbery and made application at 3:30 p.m. on the afternoon of the trial date to produce his sister as a witness, the court was justified in refusing an adjournment on the grounds that counsel knew, or should have known, whether this witness was required prior to trial. [ State v. Smith, supra ( 66 N.J. Super. at 468 , 169 A. 2d 482 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.