Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 Ohio App. 2d 41 - State v. Howze

66 Ohio App. 2d 41 - State v. Howze’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Neil v. Biggers · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · Leland v. Oregon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is obvious that one may commit a purposeful act not knowing it to be wrong, or commit such a purposeful act, even though the actor knows the act to be wrong, but lacks the ability to refrain from doing it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the burden complained of by defendant is not one directed to an essential element of the crime charged but, rather, to the question of defendant's criminal volition--to his actions as a 'free agent' under the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. ““The burden of going forward with the evidence of an affirmative defense, and the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, for an affirmative defense, is upon the accused.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.