66 Ohio App. 2d 41 - State v. Howze’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Neil v. Biggers · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · Leland v. Oregon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is obvious that one may commit a purposeful act not knowing it to be wrong, or commit such a purposeful act, even though the actor knows the act to be wrong, but lacks the ability to refrain from doing it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the burden complained of by defendant is not one directed to an essential element of the crime charged but, rather, to the question of defendant's criminal volition--to his actions as a 'free agent' under the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Howze v. Marshall““The burden of going forward with the evidence of an affirmative defense, and the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence, for an affirmative defense, is upon the accused.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.