Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 Ohio App. 3d 794 - State v. Lukens

66 Ohio App. 3d 794 - State v. Lukens’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably 94 Ohio App. 3d 203 - State v. Pirman (1994), 70 Ohio App. 3d 69 - State v. Andriola (1990)

31 state decisions

1201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · Alford v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merely because some error or irregularity has intervened, unless the substantial rights of the accused or the prosecution are adversely affected.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “As a matter of law, a child is unruly who engages in sexual activity with an adult, 'as it is inherently injurious to the morals of the child or others.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a reviewing court must examine an array of factors, including the importance of the witness's testimony in the [defendant's] case, the cumulative nature of the testimony, the presence or absence of corroborating or contradictory evidence, the scope of cross-examination otherwise permitted, and the overall strength of the prosecution's case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.