Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 OHIOST2D 483 - State v. Sturm

State v. Sturm’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2017

23 state decisions

801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Ballard · State v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hile a trial court is required by Crim.R. 11(C) to inform a defendant of this right, it is not required by [Boykin].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.