State v. Storch’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Muttart (2007), State v. Lopez (1996)
3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · New York v. Belton · Idaho v. Wright · White v. Illinois · State v. Boston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any trial, in any court, the party accused shall be allowed to * * * meet the witnesses face to face.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Evid.R. 807 accords with the right of confrontation guaranteed by both Section 10, Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carter · State v. O.A.B.“* * * We construe the right to confrontation contained in Section 10, Article I to require live testimony where *Page 31 reasonably possible. However, circumstances may exist where the evidence clearly indicates that a child may suffer significant emotional harm by being forced to testify in the actual presence of a person he or she is accusing of abuse. In such circumstances, the child may be considered unavailable for purposes of the Rules of Evidence and the out-of-court statements admitted without doing violence to Section 10, Article I * * *”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.