Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 Okla. 288 - Baird v. Conover

Baird v. Conover’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
March 1956
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1956

13 state decisions

7019171920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Hamlin · Atlee v. Fink · Stearns v. Hochbrunn · Sessions v. Payne & Tye · Lum v. McEwen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"An agent must not, except with his principal’s full knowledge and consent, enter into any transaction concerning the subject-matter of the agency in which he has interests adverse to those of his principal.” (Citing numerous authorities.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.