Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 OR 465 - Coffey v. Scott

Coffey v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 1932
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1932

14 state decisions

90191319201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Raymond v. Flavel · Sabin v. Columbia Fuel Co. · Garnier v. Wheeler · Pippin v. Tapia · Hurford v. Harned

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Three things # * must concur to protect the title of the purchaser: (1) He must buy without notice of the bad intent on the part of the vendor; (2) he must be a purchaser for a valuable consideration; and (3) he must have paid the purchase money before he had notice of the fraud.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.