Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 Or. App. 496

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1984

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1984-01-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1984

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-01-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1The trial court’s order finding defendant to be in contempt is inadequate in that it does not identify the statutory basis upon which it is entered. Accordingly, we cannot determine if it was proper.

¶2Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.1

¶3 On remand, the trial court may wish to consider, inter alia, the impact such decisions as SER Spencer v. Howe, 281 Or 599, 576 P2d 4 (1978), have on the procedures that must be followed (and the punishment that can he imposed) with respect to conduct like that of defendant.

/66/orapp/496 · .json · Public domain