State v. Hardesty’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 45 Wash. App. 590 - State v. Bernhard · State v. Huffmeyer · 57 Wash. App. 688 - State v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the language and intent of CrR 3.3(c)(2)(ii) is best effectuated by reading `detained in jail' for purposes of determining `time elapsed in district court' as meaning detention on the current charge at the time of filing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“State v. Hardesty, 110 Wash.App. 702, 710, 713 , 42 P.3d 450 (2002). On review, the State argued that the Court of Appeals erred in interpreting the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he plain language of the definition of time elapsed in district court is not restricted to those defendants in jail on the offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.