Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 Pa. Super. 297

Newhoff v. Rochester

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1917

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1917-03-16

Appeal, No. 194, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 5331, discharging rule for judgment on answers in case of Lewis Newhoff v. Rubin Rochester and Ettie Rochester, defendants, and Richard Building & Loan Association, Garnishee. Rule for judgment on answers in attachment execution.

Affirmed · Decided 1917-03-16

Per Curiam,

¶1The only assignment presented is that the court erred in discharging the appellant’s rule for judgment on the appellee’s answer to interrogatories.

¶2The opinion filed by Audeneied, J., is a convincing answer to the appellant’s argument, and for the reasons given in discharging the rule, the judgment is affirmed.

/66/pasuper/297 · .json · Public domain