¶1Opinion by
¶2The appeal in this case was taken January 26, 1916, *343and was regularly on the list at Philadelphia in October for argument; it was continued at the request of appellants’ counsel to be heard at Harrisburg. When called for argument on the 13th of March, it was found that the assignments of error printed in the paper books disregarded our rules of court (Rules 14-16), and that no assignments of error had been filed with the record.
¶3The appeal is quashed.