In Re Dillon’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “1. On December 6, 2005, respondent was indicted on eleven counts by a federal grand jury. |42. On March 30, 2007, respondent was convicted by a jury on all eleven counts. 3. On December 11, 2009, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed respondent’s convictions as to Counts Two (conspiracy to commit federal program bribery), Twelve (federal program bribery), and Fourteen (federal program bribery) and affirmed respondent’s conviction as to all other counts; namely: Counts One (conspiracy), Three (racketeering), Four (mail fraud/honest services), Five (mail fraud/honest services), Six (mail fraud/honest services), Eight (wire fraud/honest services), Nine (mail fraud/honest services), and Ten (mail fraud/honest services). The court of appeals remanded the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi for resentencing purposes only. 4. On October 4, 2010, the United States Supreme Court denied respondent’s petition for writ of certio-rari. 5. On February 11, 2011, the Mississippi Supreme Court ordered respondent’s permanent disbarment from the practice of law in Mississippi. 6. On June 8, 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi denied respondent’s motion to vacate his convictions. 7.On June 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi resentenced respondent.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Minor