Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 So. 3d 812

Lane v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 18, 2009

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 2009-12-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2010

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-12-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WINDOM, Judge,

¶1concurring in part and dissenting in part.

¶2I concur in affirming Lane’s conviction. For the reasons stated in my writing on original submission, I disagree with the plurality’s decision to overturn Lane’s 120-year sentence and to remand the case for re-sentencing. I, therefore, dissent from the affirmance of Lane’s sentence on return to remand.

*824MAIN, Judge,

¶3concurring in part and dissenting in part.

¶4I concur in affirming Carlton Reashard Lane’s conviction. For the reasons stated in my writing on original submission, I dissent as to the propriety of instructing the trial court to resentence Lane.

/66/so3d/812 · .json · Public domain