Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 SW3D 110 - State v. Gaskins

State v. Gaskins’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Beeler · State v. Hineman · State v. Guidorzi · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sommers · State v. McCoy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plain error review of instructional error is warranted where an error so substantially affects the rights of an accused that manifest injustice results if it is left uncorrected. State v. McCoy, 971 S.W.2d 861, 864 (Mo.App.1998). Instructional error constitutes plain error when it is clear the trial court so misdirected or failed to instruct the jury so that it is apparent the error affected the verdict. State v. Beeler, 12 S.W.3d 294, 300 (Mo. banc 2000).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.