Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 TC 538 - Green v. Commissioner

Green v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Norgaard v. Commissioner (1991), Estate of Temple v. Commissioner (1976)

2 federal appellate ·

46019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Welch v. Helvering · Cohan v. Commissioner · Parham v. Cortese · Golsen v. Commissioner · Wickwire v. Reinecke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he regular disclosure of the daily records to an accountant and the maintenance of a journal and general ledger by the accountant which appear to be unusually complete and accurate for a gambling operation of the kind involved herein have in large measure dispelled any notion of connivance or deceit on the part of the petitioner in reporting his gambling losses,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “All gambling payouts, amounts paid to redeem chips, as well as all business expenses, e.g., rent, utilities, and food, were paid in cash from the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “tabulation of the amounts paid for chips less the amount paid to redeem chips would have served to verify the net win or loss figures”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.