Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 U.S. 108 - 4885 Bags of Linseed

4885 Bags of Linseed’s Empirical Analysis

66 U.S. 108 · 1861

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018 · most notably The Belfast (1868), Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Dimon Steamship Corp. (1933)

24 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions

1201861187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pliny Cutler v. William a Rae · Israel Raymond v. William Tyson · Hussey v. Thornton · Van Bokkelin v. Ingersoll

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t would be a serious sacrifice of his interests if the ship was compelled, in order to preserve the lien, to remain day after day with her cargo on board, waiting until the consignee found it convenient to pay the freight, or until the lien could be enforced in a court of admiralty .... if the cargo cannot be unladen and placed in the warehouse of the consignee, without waiving the lien, it would seriously embarrass the ordinary operations and convenience of commerce, both as to the ship-owner and the merchant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is frequently, perhaps more usually, understood between the parties, that transferring the goods from the ship to the warehouse shall not be regarded as a waiver of the lien, and that the ship-owner reserves the right to proceed in rem to enforce it, if the freight is not paid.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The lien of the carrier by water for his freight, under the ordinary bill of lading, although it is maritime, yet it stands upon the same ground with the carrier by land, and arises from his right to retain the possession until the freight is paid, and is lost by an unconditional delivery to the consignee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.