Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 U.S. 192 - Hodge v. Combs

Hodge v. Combs’s Empirical Analysis

66 U.S. 192 · 1861

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1988

1 district · 5 state decisions

401861187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richmond v. City of Milwaukie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ T, Leslie Combs, do hereby constitute and appoint James Love, of Texas, my general and special agent to do and transact all manner of business in which I may be interested there, hereby ratifying and confirming the acts of my agent as fully as if done by myself. “ ‘Witness my hand and seal, the 13th day of February, 1840. ‘Leslie Combs. (Seal).’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.