Rice v. Railroad Co.’s Empirical Analysis
66 U.S. 358 · 1861
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 8 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1994 · most notably Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois (1892), United States v. Sanges (1892)
23 federal appellate · 8 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grignon's Lessee v. Astor · People ex rel. Fleming v. Livingston · Jackson ex rel. Howell v. Delancey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Notwithstanding those decisions, the question was presented to the court for the third time in the ease of Patterson v. AVinn, 11 Wheat. 388 ; and on that occasion this court, after referring to the previous decisions, said: ‘We may therefore assume, as the settled doctrine of the court, that if a pateht is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuing thereof was without'authority, or prohibited by statute, or the state had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a court of law in an action of ejectment.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Albritton v. Shaw“Suits by an administrator, fiduciary, participant, or beneficiary of an employee benefit plan to ... compel [the Secretary] to take action required under this subchap-ter may be brought in the district court of the United States for the district where the plan has its principal office, or in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“clear that it was not competent for Congress to pass the repealing act and divest the title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.