66 Wash. App. 10 - King County v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 283 - Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. Gudjonsson · 35 Wash. App. 150 - Heaney v. Seattle Municipal Court · 111 Wash. 2d 548 - State v. Chavez · 54 Wash. App. 274 - Stork v. International Bazaar, Inc. · 54 Wash. App. 829 - City of Seattle v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so antithetical that it is impossible as a matter of law that they can both be effective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sorenson v. Dahlen“The ultimate test is whether `[t]he two rules can be reconciled and both given effect.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sorenson v. Dahlen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.