Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 WASHAPP 604 - State v. Decker

State v. Decker’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When any person is convicted of two or more crimes, whether in the same proceeding or court or in different proceedings or courts, and whether by judgment rendered by the same judge or by different judges, the second or other subsequent judgment upon which sentence is ordered to be executed shall direct whether the terms of imprisonment or any of them to which he is sentenced shall run concurrently or consecutively; Upon the failure of the court so to determine how the terms of imprisonment on the second or . subsequent judgment shall run, the term of imprisonment on the second or subsequent judgment shall run concurrently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.