Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

660 A.2d 397

In re Friedman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-26

Relies on In re Friedman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-06-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2011

6 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of the record herein and of the unanimous Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that David Alan Friedman, previously sanctioned by order of this court, 643 A.2d 902 (D.C.1994), has by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to D.C.Bar R. XI, § 16(d) met the conditions for reinstatement imposed by said order and that he accordingly should be reinstated as a member of the bar of this court, it is

¶3ORDERED that David Alan Friedman be, and he hereby is, reinstated as a member of the bar of this court.

/660/a2d/397 · .json · Public domain