Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 A.2d 704 - State v. Griffith

State v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morissette v. United States · State v. Tobin · State v. Griffith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the intentional touching of the victim’s or accused’s intimate parts, clothed or unclothed, if that intentional touching can be reasonably construed as intended by the accused to be for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or assault.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[a] person is guilty of first degree child molestation sexual assault if he or she engages in sexual penetration with' a person fourteen (14) years of age or under.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.