State v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morissette v. United States · State v. Tobin · State v. Griffith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the intentional touching of the victim’s or accused’s intimate parts, clothed or unclothed, if that intentional touching can be reasonably construed as intended by the accused to be for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or assault.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Yanez““[a] person is guilty of first degree child molestation sexual assault if he or she engages in sexual penetration with' a person fourteen (14) years of age or under.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Yanez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.