Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 F.2d 1078 - Oldham v. Schweiker

Oldham v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

660 F.2d 1078 · 1981

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Bloodsworth v. Heckler (1983), Johnson v. Bowen (1988)

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

5801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Johnson v. Harris · Strickland v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “opinion of an examining physician is generally entitled to more weight than the opinion of a non-examining physician.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “], appellant was not disabled. 1 Sryock then commenced this action in district court. The district court affirmed the Secretary's decision and this appeal followed. II. DISCUSSION 4 A. Rejection of Treating Physician's Opinion 5 Appellant contends that the Secretary's decision is not supported by substantial evidence, in that the ALJ failed to articulate specific reasons for rejecting the opinion of Dr. Grant, the treating pulmonary specialist. We disagree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.