Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 F.2d 116 - Hall v. Schweiker

Hall v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

660 F.2d 116 · 1981

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Newton v. Apfel (2000), Elian Gonzalez v. Janet Reno (2000)

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

18019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · Morton v. Ruiz · DePaepe v. Richardson · Sheehan v. Army & Air Force Exchange Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the internal procedures are more rigorous than otherwise would be required.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]hould an agency in its proceedings, violate its rules and prejudice result, the proceedings are tainted and any actions resulting from the proceeding cannot stand.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “binding on all components of the Administration. These rulings represent precedent final opinions and orders and statements of policy and interpretations that have been adopted by the Administration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.