United States v. Angelilli’s Empirical Analysis
660 F.2d 23 · 1981
Citation profile
82 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 141 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2017 · most notably Butler v. United States (1982), United States v. Concepcion (1992)
82 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2111
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Turkette · Pereira v. United States · Marchetti v. United States · National League of Cities v. Usery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the language of section 1961(4), defining enterprise,... unambiguously encompass[es] governmental units, and... the purpose and history of the Act and the substance of RICO's provisions demonstrate a clear congressional intent that RICO be interpreted to apply to activities that corrupt public or governmental entities.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Since the acts were part of the conspiracy, evidence of their occurrence was admissible to prove the conspiracy, regardless of whether they were performed by the defendant[ ] or by other coconspirators.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In cases where the incident offered is part of the conspiracy alleged in the indictment, the evidence is admissible under Rule 404(b) because it is not an 'other' crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.