Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 F.2d 375 - Peak v. Small Business Administration

Peak v. Small Business Administration’s Empirical Analysis

660 F.2d 375 · 1981

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2020

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

16019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1702 · 15 U.S.C. § 633 · 15 U.S.C. § 634 · 15 U.S.C. § 637 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1445 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679

Relies on Dalehite v. United States · Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. · Cities Service Co. v. United States · Laird v. Nelms · Small Business Administration v. McClellan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The authority of any federal agency to sue and be sued in its own name shall not be construed to authorize suits against such federal agency on claims which are cognizable under section 1346(b) of this title, and the remedies provided by this title shall be exclusive.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... the district courts ... shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions on claims against the United States, for money damages .. for injury ... or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.