United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
660 F.2d 749 · 1981
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably United States v. Foster (1983), Commonwealth v. Mason (1985)
24 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Dubrofsky · United States v. Flickinger · United States v. Robertson · United States v. Gardner · United States v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) There was prejudice in that the search might not have occurred or would not have been so abrasive if the Rule had been followed; or (2) there is evidence of intentional and deliberate disregard of a provision of the Rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Exigent circumstances are those in which a substantial risk of harm to the persons involved or to the law enforcement process would arise if the police were to delay a search until a warrant could be obtained. The need for the search must be apparent to the police, and so strong as to outweigh the important protection of individual rights provided by the warrant requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] violation is 'fundamental' only where it, in effect, renders the search unconstitutional under traditional fourth amendment standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.