Tuckel v. Grover’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[a]n administrative remedy is not 'available' "); Tuckel v. Grover, 660 F.3d 1249 , 1252-1253 (C.A.10 2011) ("[W]hen a prison official inhibits an inmate from utilizing an administrative process through threats or intimidation, that process can no longer be said to be 'available' ") ; Goebert v. Lee County, 510 F.3d 1312 , 1323 (C.A.11 2007) (If a prison "play[s] hide-and-seek with administrative remedies,”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. May v. Segovia · Ross v. Blake

2. “the threat is one that would deter a reasonable inmate of ordinary firmness and fortitude from lodging a grievance or pursuing the part of the grievance process that the inmate failed to exhaust.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Rinaldi v. United States · May v. Segovia

3. “Once a defendant proves that a plaintiff failed to exhaust, however, the onus falls on the plaintiff to show that remedies were unavailable....”); Nunez, 591 F.3d at 1224 (”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Albino v. Baca · May v. Segovia