United States v. Siddons’s Empirical Analysis
660 F.3d 699 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 80B · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Bertoli · United States v. Bailey · United States v. Brennan · United States v. Starnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he determination of loss and other factors pertinent to a fraudulent scheme is never confined to the date of the charged mailing or wiring, but always encompasses all relevant conduct that was part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.