Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 FAPPX 23 - Cox v. BlackBerry Limited

Cox v. BlackBerry Limited’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 2021
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Foman v. Davis · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actually possessed information contradicting their public statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.