Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 FSUPP 793 - Cenker v. Cenker

Cenker v. Cenker’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
June 2007
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. United States · Markham v. Allen · Infelice v. United States · Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. · Morgan Walton Properties, Inc. v. International City Bank & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [probate] exception applies both to purely probate matters, and to matters ancillary to probate in the practical sense that allowing it [the case] to be maintained in federal court would impair the policies served by the probate exception to diversity jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The probate exception is a practical doctrine designed to promote legal certainty and judicial economy by providing a single forum of litigation, and to tap the expertise of probate judges by conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the probate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.