Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 N.E.2d 1068 - Hendrickson v. State

Hendrickson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on White v. State · Weatherford v. State · 168 Ind. App. 674 - Rose v. State · Helton v. State · 75 Cal. App. Supp. 3d 1 - People v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although an intoxicated moped driver may not have the same offensive striking power as does an intoxicated driver of a standard motor vehicle, the intoxicated moped driver is still a serious danger to the public. We cannot conclude that the legislature intended to allow people who are convicted habitual traffic offenders to drive a moped while intoxicated, thereby endangering the lives and property of others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.