Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 So. 2d 1038 - State v. Hamilton

660 So. 2d 1038 - State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 831 So. 2d 172 - State v. Atkinson (2002), United States v. Matthews (2006)

5 federal appellate · 54 state decisions

260199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sloan v. Hicks · United States v. Dunn · McSurely v. McClellan · 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether such building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night, together with the curtilage thereof.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “carr[ied] forward the common law requirement of some form of an enclosure in order for the area surrounding a residence to be considered part of the `curtilage.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a building of any kind, either temporary or permanent, which has a roof over it, together with the curtilage thereof.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.