Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 So. 2d 1052 - Heuss v. State

660 So. 2d 1052 - Heuss v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2018

11 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Rauer v. United States · 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · Williams v. State · State v. Jimeno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In pretrial motions, appellant challenged the trustworthiness and reliability of the child-victims' statements based upon possible contamination of the children's statements as a result of discussions with their parents and other children; leading questions by Child A's mother and the deputies; untimeliness of the statements in relation to the events; and the lack of spontaneity of the children's statements. We hold that appellant adequately preserved this issue for appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that appellant did not preserve this issue for review because he failed to object to the lack of specific findings concerning the reliability of the children's hearsay statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he record, however, contains numerous objections by appellant to the admission of these statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.