¶1dissenting.
¶2Based on the authority of our supreme court’s holding in Ex parte Veazey, 637 So.2d 1348 (Ala.1993), I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.
¶3THIGPEN, J., concurs.
660 So. 2d 1308
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided May 5, 1995
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 1995-05-05
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2002
2 state decisions
Relies on 637 So. 2d 1348 - Ex Parte Veazey
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-05-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1dissenting.
¶2Based on the authority of our supreme court’s holding in Ex parte Veazey, 637 So.2d 1348 (Ala.1993), I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.
¶3THIGPEN, J., concurs.