660 So. 2d 182 - Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2023
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc. · 289 So. 2d 116 - Edmonston v. A-Second Mortgage Co. of Slidell, Inc. · 342 So. 2d 661 - Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. · 456 So. 2d 622 - Kirkpatrick v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fox v. Don Siebarth Pontiac, Inc., 458 So.2d 575 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 461 So.2d 314 (1984); La. C.C. art. 1846. The plaintiff may be the one credible witness. Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick, 27,241 (La.App. 2 Cir. 8/23/95), 660 So.2d 182 , writ denied, 95-2579 (La.12/15/95), 664 So.2d 444 ; Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 342 So.2d 661 (La.1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“need only be general in nature; independent proof of every detail of the agreement is not required. Id.; Miller v. Harvey, 408 So.2d 946 (La.App. 2 Cir.1981). Smith's testimony sufficed as the one credible witness. The sole issue is therefore whether he supplied the requisite”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The `other corroborating circumstances' need only be general in nature; independent proof of every detail of the agreement is not required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.