Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 So. 2d 220 - Henderson v. State

660 So. 2d 220 - Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2016

17 state decisions

80199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strong v. United States · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State · Neal v. Mississippi · 385 So. 2d 1298 - Norman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is axiomatic that a jury's verdict may not stand upon uncontradicted fact alone. The fact must be found via jury instructions correctly identifying the elements of the offense under the proper standards.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Court instructs the Jury that if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that ROOSEVELT DEXTER ARMSTEAD, on or about the date testified about, did unlawfully, wilfully, feloniously and forcibly attempt to rape and ravish Sharon E. Perkins, a female human being over the age of fourteen (14) years, by ripping the nightgown off Sharon E. Perkins after having thrown her onto a couch and attempted to straddle her, against the will and without the consent of the said Sharon E. Perkins, then it is your sworn duty to find the defendant guilty of attempted rape as charged in Count Two of the Indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The Court instructs the Jury that if you believe from the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that on or about August 23, 1994, in Jackson County, Mississippi, the defendant committed an aggravated assault in and upon the body of Kevin Bickham with a certain deadly weapon, to wit: a shotgun, without provocation, or without threat of great bodily harm to himself, then it will be your sworn duty to find the defendant guilty as charged. If the State has failed to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt then you shall find the defendant not guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.