660 So. 2d 237 - Rogers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Gudinas v. State (1997), 967 So. 2d 735 - Williams v. State (2007)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · 493 So. 2d 1019 - Wilson v. State · State v. Jano · Taylor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here the time interval between the event and the statement is long enough to permit reflective thought, the statement will be excluded in the absence of some proof that the declarant did not in fact engage in a reflective thought process.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) there must be an event startling enough to cause nervous excitement; (2) the statement must have been made before there was time to contrive or misrepresent; and (3) the statement must be made while the person is under the stress of excitement caused by the event.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Patterson v. State · Beck v. State“(2) EXCITED UTTERANCE.A statement or excited utterance relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.