Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 So. 2d 385 - Warrington v. State

660 So. 2d 385 - Warrington v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · 110 So. 2d 7 - State v. Bateh · 101 So. 2d 869 - Bateh v. State · 586 So. 2d 488 - Bashlor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Usually a defendant cannot agree to an illegal sentence, but when the illegal alternative and conditional defects which benefited that defendant are no longer in effect, the terms of incarceration that were agreed upon are valid so long as they are not beyond the statutory maximums for the offenses for which the defendant was convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Existing case law recognizes that once a defendant has enjoyed the benefits of probation without challenging the legality of sentence, the defendant is thereafter precluded from complaining that the sentence is illegal in an appeal from an order revoking probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.