¶1Affirmed. Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993); Tremblay v. Tremblay, 638 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Stockburger v. Stockburger, 633 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Baez v. Baez, 627 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), rev. denied, 639 So.2d 975 (Fla.1994); Tamari v. Turko-Tamari, 599 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Lenders v. Durham, 564 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Hill v. Hill, 548 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 560 So.2d 233 (Fla.1990); Sherman v. Sherman, 558 So.2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Landa v. Landa, 539 So.2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
660 So. 2d 421
O'Kane v. O'Kane
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 20, 1995
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-09-20
Relies on 639 So. 2d 972 - Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Funding for Criminal Justice · Cross v. State · 621 So. 2d 417 - Mize v. Mize
Decided 1995-09-20