Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 So. 2d 685 - Barwick v. State

660 So. 2d 685 - Barwick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably 753 So. 2d 29 - Rodriguez v. State (2000), Sochor v. State (2004)

1 federal appellate · 76 state decisions

4101995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Nebraska v. Wyoming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a judgment of acquittal is appropriate if the State fails to present evidence from which the jury can exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the trial judge must first determine there is competent evidence from which the jury could infer guilt to the exclusion of all other inferences.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the evidence presented does not demonstrate that Barwick had a careful plan or prearranged design to kill the victim ... [and, therefore,] the murder was not committed in a calculated manner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.